Re: Forcing index usage - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Lewis
Subject Re: Forcing index usage
Date
Msg-id CAHOFxGry6pC4AVSY04phOa_zEJ+hqUO9gOvSQdGVABEP5NHCYA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Forcing index usage  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Forcing index usage  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-general
> * Michael Lewis (mlewis@entrata.com) wrote:
> > Thanks for that advance warning since it is a handy option to force the
> > planning barrier in my experience. What's a resource to see other coming
> > changes in v12 especially changes to default behavior like this? Will there
> > be a new cte_collapse_limit setting or similar?
>
> Check the release notes.

Yes, once they are written in a few weeks.

Thanks for clarifying Bruce. On #postgresql I was directed to the development docs ( https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/queries-with.html ) and got the additional information I needed. It is unfortunate there is no MATERIALIZED keyword in v11 to ensure I can preserve existing behavior during upgrade to v12 on queries that seem to benefit greatly from that optimization barrier, but I can appreciate why that decision was made.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Forcing index usage
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Forcing index usage