Re: Execution plan does not use index - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Lewis
Subject Re: Execution plan does not use index
Date
Msg-id CAHOFxGrR-pOGQEiZdYzTB7EwoeW_3PsP0pxT0RfG3GQV9gPQCg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Execution plan does not use index  (Peter Coppens <peter.coppens@datylon.com>)
Responses Re: Execution plan does not use index
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:11 PM Peter Coppens <peter.coppens@datylon.com> wrote:
Adding the tzn.utc_offset results in the fact that the execution plan no longer considers to use the index on the measurement_value table. Is there any way the SQL can be rewritten so that the index is used? Or any other solution so that the query with the timezone offset returns in a comparable time?

I am not aware of a best practice to handle this. Your where condition on mv.timestamp now depends on several joins to do a filtering that used to be a static range that can be scanned into the index as a first node in the plan. I have sometimes used a sub-query on a broader condition that allows the use of the index, and then fully reducing the set later. Something like this-

select d.short_id,mv.timestamp,mv.I64_01
  from device d, device_configuration dc, (
select mv.*
  from measurement_value AS mv_inner
  where mv.timestamp > '2020-11-06'::timestamp - interval '1 day' and mv.timestamp < '2020-11-07'::timestamp + interval '1 day'
offset 0 /* to prevent in-lining the join to the outside set */
) mv, pg_timezone_names tzn
  where mv.device_id=d.short_id and dc.device_id = d.id and dc.latest=true and dc.timezone=tzn.name and
        mv.timestamp > '2020-11-06'::timestamp - tzn.utc_offset and mv.timestamp < '2020-11-07'::timestamp - tzn.utc_offset


By the way, it seems a little odd to be exclusive on both the begin and end. I'd usually expect timestamp >= start_date and timestamp < end_date + interval '1 day' to fully capture a 24 hour period. Right now, you are excluding any data that happens to have a timestamp value with .000000 seconds (midnight exactly).

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation