Re: Planner performance in partitions - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Michael Lewis
Subject Re: Planner performance in partitions
Date
Msg-id CAHOFxGr3TG4OAHGvkXKhHbF-h2JaXR5+djDkA6o=MsquXkLAsQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Planner performance in partitions  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses ODP: Planner performance in partitions  (Piotr Włodarczyk <piotrwlodarczyk89@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Was there a reason to exceed 100-500 partitions in real life that pushed you to do this test? Is there some issue you see when using 100 partitions that is solved or reduced in severity by increasing to 1200 or 6000 partitions?

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Lewis
Date:
Subject: Re: Last event per user
Next
From: Luís Roberto Weck
Date:
Subject: Re: