Re: Shared_buffers - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Michael Lewis
Subject Re: Shared_buffers
Date
Msg-id CAHOFxGqT24bb_G9Ej3jAwBDLizfK1dwb+rXo62mP4zjB6iDRpA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shared_buffers  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Shared_buffers  (MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA@sqlexec.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 2:29 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
Daulat Ram wrote:
> I want to know about the working and importance of shared_buffers  in Postgresql?
> is it similar to the oracle database buffer cache?

Yes, exactly.

The main difference is that PostgreSQL uses buffered I/O, while Oracle usually
uses direct I/O.

Usually you start with shared_buffers being the minimum of a quarter of the
available RAM and 8 GB.

Any good rule of thumb or write up about when shared buffers in excess of 8GBs makes sense (assuming system ram 64+ GBs perhaps)?

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Shared_buffers
Next
From: MichaelDBA
Date:
Subject: Re: Shared_buffers