Re: Number of parallel workers chosen by the optimizer for parallel append - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Lewis
Subject Re: Number of parallel workers chosen by the optimizer for parallel append
Date
Msg-id CAHOFxGo65RmCSdrkV0HvgRc7_mPEQZng4Mh63AXY-YVxrRR69A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Number of parallel workers chosen by the optimizer for parallel append  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-general
What have you tried? Changing the relevant cost parameters I assume? Nothing else going on that may be taking up those workers, right?

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw insert extremely slow
Next
From: Mark Phillips
Date:
Subject: limit of data type character varying