Re: CUDA Sorting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nulik Nol
Subject Re: CUDA Sorting
Date
Msg-id CAHO6xe9AyMc+XA=k5XZpTr+LHyE8NThcULy+1JuuMQzeE=vOWQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CUDA Sorting  (Vitor Reus <vitor.reus@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> I already did some benchmarks with GPU sorting (not in pgsql), and
> measured total sort times, copy bandwidth and energy usage, and got
> some exciting results:
Was that qsort implementation on CPU cache friendly and optimized for SSE ?
To make a fair comparison you have to take the best CPU implementation
and compare it to best GPU implementation. Because if not, you are
comparing full throttled GPU vs lazy CPU.
Check this paper on how hash join was optimized 17x when SSE
instructions were used.
www.vldb.org/pvldb/2/vldb09-257.pdf

Regards


-- 
==================================
The power of zero is infinite


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Next
From: MUHAMMAD ASIF
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL X/Open Socket / BSD Socket Issue on HP-UX