Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Facebook
Downloads
Home
>
mailing lists
Covering the comparison between date and timestamp, tz, type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From
Kwangwon Seo
Subject
Covering the comparison between date and timestamp, tz, type
Date
April 2
03:18:19
Msg-id
CAHJxwBUWX0_SSOfGW4cfo+5rPH0=a0e8KV1kE7rgwKDy7gU9cA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Raw
List
pgsql-hackers
Tree view
Hi,
Using the PostgreSQL code coverage report, I found that tests for comparisons between date and timestamp[tz] are missing. Some of them have only partial coverage.
Attached patch will cover following functions:
date_eq_timestamp
date_ne_timestamp
date_lt_timestamp
date_gt_timestamp // already covered
date_le_timestamp
date_ge_timestamp
date_eq_timestamptz
date_ne_timestamptz
date_lt_timestamptz // already covered
date_gt_timestamptz // already covered
date_le_timestamptz
date_ge_timestamptz
timestamp_eq_date
timestamp_ne_date
timestamp_lt_date
timestamp_gt_date // already covered
timestamp_le_date
timestamp_ge_date
timestamptz_eq_date
timestamptz_ne_date
timestamptz_lt_date
timestamptz_gt_date // already covered
timestamptz_le_date
timestamptz_ge_date // already covered
This is a minor patch, but I’d like to submit it to enhance test coverage.
Best regards,
Kwangwon Seo
Attachment
v1-0001-Add-test-for-extra-comparison-between-date-and-timestamp.patch
pgsql-hackers
by date:
Previous
From:
Noah Misch
Date:
02 April, 03:13:24
Subject:
Re: AIO v2.5
Next
From:
Tom Lane
Date:
02 April, 04:05:48
Subject:
Re: bug when apply fast default mechanism for adding new column over domain with default value
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
I confirm that I have read and accepted PostgresPro’s
Privacy Policy
.
I agree to get Postgres Pro discount offers and other marketing communications.
✖
×
×
Everywhere
Documentation
Mailing list
List:
all lists
pgsql-general
pgsql-hackers
buildfarm-members
pgadmin-hackers
pgadmin-support
pgsql-admin
pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-announce
pgsql-benchmarks
pgsql-bugs
pgsql-chat
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-cygwin
pgsql-docs
pgsql-hackers-pitr
pgsql-hackers-win32
pgsql-interfaces
pgsql-jdbc
pgsql-jobs
pgsql-novice
pgsql-odbc
pgsql-patches
pgsql-performance
pgsql-php
pgsql-pkg-debian
pgsql-pkg-yum
pgsql-ports
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-ru-general
pgsql-sql
pgsql-students
pgsql-testers
pgsql-translators
pgsql-www
psycopg
Period
anytime
within last day
within last week
within last month
within last 6 months
within last year
Sort by
date
reverse date
rank
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to
Privacy Policy
.
I accept cookies