[ADMIN] Logging: stderr vs syslog? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Don Seiler
Subject [ADMIN] Logging: stderr vs syslog?
Date
Msg-id CAHJZqBDe51uWLTiRpHJE_Ebj6mbGH8QhmK7j4hSTiLLbr6G8hA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [ADMIN] Logging: stderr vs syslog?  (Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com>)
Re: [ADMIN] Logging: stderr vs syslog?  (Evan Rempel <erempel@uvic.ca>)
List pgsql-admin
I've just inherited a few PostgreSQL DBs, having come from Oracle land. I'm looking to shore up the logging situation. Right now we use stderr logging and they get rotated based on size threshold. I'd like for those old logs to be gzipped so we can keep more on disk rather than current method of just deleting old logs to free up space. This is mostly on pgsql 9.2 with a couple of 9.3, but I'm planning to upgrade everything to 9.6.3 when I get my feet on solid ground.

Couple of question around this:
  1. I thought logrotate would be a no-brainer here, but it sounds like I should then change to use syslog rather than stderr. I've read some caveats around syslog needing to sync files and potentially slow things down. I'm wondering if any grizzled production postgres veterans could offer up their experience.
  2. Alternatively I could just keep it going with stderr and have a separate script run find/gzip on log files beyond a certain mtime threshold. This would probably be the quickest to implement, but I'd much rather use logrotate facilities if there are no strong opinions against using syslog.
Thanks in advance for your time, I'm sure I'll be making a lot of us of these mailing lists in the not-too-distant future.

Don.

--
Don Seiler
www.seiler.us

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Albe Laurenz
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Postgres HA using Shared Disk Solution
Next
From: Scott Mead
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Logging: stderr vs syslog?