On 08/11/2017 02:35 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On 8/11/17 10:15, Murtuza Zabuawala wrote: some time whe have 2 process postgres for 1 instance like this exppgs 17769 1 0 01:06 ? 00:01:04 /usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/postgres -D /bases/postgresql/scl/data -i -p 5450 -h bd-sillage.info.xxxx exppgs 39922 17769 0 15:39 ? 00:00:00 /usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/postgres -D /bases/postgresql/scl/data -i -p 5450 -h bd-sillage.info.xxxx It appears that the second one is a process forked off from the first one. That looks normal to me. Because of the reference to 17769 in the second entry?
On 8/11/17 10:15, Murtuza Zabuawala wrote: some time whe have 2 process postgres for 1 instance like this exppgs 17769 1 0 01:06 ? 00:01:04 /usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/postgres -D /bases/postgresql/scl/data -i -p 5450 -h bd-sillage.info.xxxx exppgs 39922 17769 0 15:39 ? 00:00:00 /usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/postgres -D /bases/postgresql/scl/data -i -p 5450 -h bd-sillage.info.xxxx It appears that the second one is a process forked off from the first one. That looks normal to me.
On 8/11/17 10:15, Murtuza Zabuawala wrote:
some time whe have 2 process postgres for 1 instance like this exppgs 17769 1 0 01:06 ? 00:01:04 /usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/postgres -D /bases/postgresql/scl/data -i -p 5450 -h bd-sillage.info.xxxx exppgs 39922 17769 0 15:39 ? 00:00:00 /usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/postgres -D /bases/postgresql/scl/data -i -p 5450 -h bd-sillage.info.xxxx
It appears that the second one is a process forked off from the first one. That looks normal to me.
pgsql-general by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
