Re: Patch: Show process IDs of processes holding a lock; show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Patch: Show process IDs of processes holding a lock; show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwHMP_yaiVYy8scTCLO+no9b+a23Y5+jQWFPwp410HpXLA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch: Show process IDs of processes holding a lock; show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire  (Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com>)
Responses Re: Patch: Show process IDs of processes holding a lock; show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire  (Christian Kruse <christian@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Rajeev rastogi
<rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com> wrote:
> On 04 February 2014 14:38, Myself wrote:
>
>>
>> On 4th February 2014, Christian kruse Wrote:
>> > On 04/02/14 12:38, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> > > ISTM that the phrase "Request queue" is not used much around the
>> lock.
>> > > Using the phrase "wait queue" or Simon's suggestion sound better to
>> > at least me.
>> > > Thought?
>> >
>> > Sounds reasonable to me. Attached patch changes messages to the
>> > following:
>> >
>> > Process holding the lock: A. Wait queue: B.
>> > Processes holding the lock: A, B. Wait queue: C.
>>
>> This looks good to me also.
>
> I have tested the revised patch and found ready to be committed.
>
> I am marking this as "Ready for Committer".

Committed!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY table FROM STDIN doesn't show count tag
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"