Re: Several problems in tab-completions for SET/RESET - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Several problems in tab-completions for SET/RESET
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwGANT0dt_UE+vjco_fE3wQL6AhKOtLaTxVyt8K9jkuqVA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Several problems in tab-completions for SET/RESET  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Several problems in tab-completions for SET/RESET
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> If we do that, we also should change the tab-completion for SET command
>> so that "=" is suggested. But I'm afraid that which might decrease that
>> tab-completion.
>>
>> Imagine the case of "SET work_mem <tab>". If "TO" and "=" are suggested,
>> we need to type either "T" or "=" and then <tab> to input the setting value.
>> Otherwise, "SET work_mem <tab>" suggests only "TO" and we can input
>> the setting value by just typing <tab> again.
>> This extra step is very small, but SET command is usually used very often,
>> so I'd like to avoid such extra step.
>
> OK, that's fine.

Pushed. Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: [DOCS] pgbench doc typos
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)