On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> wrote:
>
>
> --On 3. Februar 2012 13:21:11 +0900 Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It seems to be more user-friendly to introduce a view like pg_stat_backup
>> rather than the function returning an array.
>
>
> I like this idea. A use case i saw for monitoring backup_label's in the
> past, was mainly to discover a forgotten exclusive pg_stop_backup() (e.g.
> due to broken backup scripts). If the view would be able to distinguish
> both, exclusive and non-exclusive backups, this would be great.
Agreed. Monitoring an exclusive backup is very helpful. But I wonder
why we want to monitor non-exclusive backup. Is there any use case?
If we want to monitor non-exclusive backup, why not pg_dump backup?
If there is no use case, it seems sufficient to implement the function
which reports the information only about exclusive backup.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
