Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop]
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwFb9WqWpqbz_vupCpWf7B7=WEt_XFmqX26g-uiyrCtuTg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop]  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop]
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> comments?

+    fprintf(output, _("  ECHO               control what input is
written to standard output [all, queries]\n"));

The valid values in the help messages should be consistent with
the values that the tab-completion displays. So in the case of ECHO,
"errors" and "none" also should be added in the message. Thought?

In the help messages of some psql variables like ECHO_HIDDEN, valid
values are not explained. Why not?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop]
Next
From: Pavan Deolasee
Date:
Subject: Re: Is this code safe?