Re: Report the number of skipped frozen pages by manual VACUUM - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Report the number of skipped frozen pages by manual VACUUM
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwFY=NOaMkDUiszK+rD8NCBgf2mn=26y1Rr6igg39PWoQA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Report the number of skipped frozen pages by manual VACUUM  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 20:08:42 +0900
>>> Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Jim Nasby <jim.nasby@openscg.com> wrote:
>>>> > On 3/6/17 8:34 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I don't think it can say "1 frozen pages" because the number of
>>>> >> skipped pages according to visibility map is always more than 32
>>>> >> (SKIP_PAGES_THRESHOLD).
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > That's just an artifact of how the VM currently works. I'm not a fan of
>>>> > cross dependencies like that unless there's a pretty good reason.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the comment.
>>>> Agreed. Attached fixed version patch.
>>>
>>> It seems that it says "frozen pages" if pinskipped_pages is not zero,
>>> rather than about frozenskipped_pages.
>>>
>>> How about writing as below?
>>>
>>>     appendStringInfo(&buf, ngettext("Skipped %u page due to buffer pins, "
>>>                                     "Skipped %u pages due to buffer pins, ",
>>>                                     vacrelstats->pinskipped_pages),
>>>                      vacrelstats->pinskipped_pages);
>>>     appendStringInfo(&buf, ngettext("%u frozen page.\n", "%u frozen pages.\n",
>>>                                     vacrelstats->frozenskipped_pages),
>>>                      vacrelstats->frozenskipped_pages);
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, you're right. I've attached the updated version patch
>> incorporated your comment and fixing documentation.
>
> The patch looks very simple and good to me.
> Barring objection, I will commit this.

Pushed.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Beena Emerson
Date:
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid SnapshotResetXmin() during AtEOXact_Snapshot()