On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2014-06-02 22:59:55 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
>> > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >> You're concerned about the scenario using pg_upgrade? I'm not sure
>> > >> the detail
>> > >> of pg_upgrade. But if it doesn't work properly, we should have gotten
>> > >> the trouble
>> > >
>> > > I'm not worried about pg_upgrade, because by design pg_stat_statements
>> > > will discard stats files that originated in earlier versions. However,
>> > > I don't see a need to change pg_stat_statements to serialize its
>> > > statistics to disk in the pg_stat directory before we branch off 9.4.
>> > > As you mentioned, it's harmless.
>> >
>> > Yeah, that's an idea. OTOH, there is no *strong* reason to postpone
>> > the fix to 9.5. So I just feel inclined to apply the fix now...
>>
>> +1 for fixing it now.
>>
>
> +1 for fixing it for 9.4 before the next beta, but *not* backpatching it to
> 9.3 - it *is* a behaviour change after all..
Yep, I just applied the patch only to HEAD.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
