On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Michael Paquier
>>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> >> Okay, that argument I buy.
>>> >>
>>> >> I suppose this function/view should report no row at all if there is no
>>> >> wal receiver connected, rather than a view with nulls.
>>> >
>>> > The function returns PG_RETURN_NULL() so as we don't have to use a
>>> > SRF, and the view checks for IS NOT NULL, so there would be no rows
>>> > popping up.
>>>
>>> In short, I would just go with the attached and call it a day.
>>
>> Done, thanks.
Thanks!
I have one question; why do we call the column "conn_info" instead of
"conninfo" which is basically used in other places? "conninfo" is better to me.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
