On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Any reason or objection to committing this patch?
The checkpointer doesn't call pgstat_send_bgwriter(), but it should.
Otherwise, some entries in pg_stat_bgwriter will never be updated.
If we adopt the patch, checkpoint is performed by checkpointer. So
it looks odd that information related to checkpoint exist in
pg_stat_bgwriter. We should move them to new catalog even if
it breaks the compatibility?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
