Re: [BUG] False indication in pg_stat_replication.sync_state - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: [BUG] False indication in pg_stat_replication.sync_state
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwEj6ETY4DFUmaXbEUcD9PCq9OopobXV4gOkvsrhH+Y-bQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUG] False indication in pg_stat_replication.sync_state  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [BUG] False indication in pg_stat_replication.sync_state
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> Ouch! I'm sorry to have sent truly buggy version, please abandon
>> v2 patch sent just before.
>>
>> Added include "access/transam.h" to syncrep.c and corrected the
>> name of XLByteEQ.
>
> Thanks for updating the patch! This looks good to me.
>
>>> Thank you for comment.
>>>
>>> > > I think this patch should be applied for 9.2.2 and 9.1.7.
>>> >
>>> > Looks good to me, though I don't think the source code comment needs
>>> > to be updated in the way the patch does.
>>>
>>> Ok, the patch for walsender.c becomes 1 liner, quite simple.
>>>
>>> However, I've forgotten to treat other three portions in
>>> walsender.c and syncrep.c also does XLogRecPtrIsInvalid(<XLogPtr
>>> which comes from WAL receiver>).  This new patch includes the
>>> changes for them.
>
> Good catch.

Does any commiter pick up this?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Deferrable NOT NULL constraints in 9.3?
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch]