On Mon, Oct 5, 2026 at 8:35 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
> I think the repeated creating/dropping is a bit wasteful though and we
> don't need it. Wouldn't it make more sense to have all tests use CREATE
> IF NOT EXISTS and then remove all the DROPs of it? We would end up
> having the extension after the tests are run, but since the database is
> specifically created to run the isolation tests, it's not a problem if
> it remains there. The attached patch would do that. (I am proposing
> this change just for pg20.)
+1
-# A foreign key check racing a rebuild of the index it resolves through.
#
# Pause the RI fast path before it locks the referenced table, allowing
Removing the first line of the comment seems unnecessary?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
