RE: Fix apply worker crash when subscriber table has only a deferrable primary key - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: Fix apply worker crash when subscriber table has only a deferrable primary key
Date
Msg-id OS7PR01MB183177937497570C7257C56EFF5952@OS7PR01MB18317.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Fix apply worker crash when subscriber table has only a deferrable primary key  (Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Nisha,

> I’ve also updated the commit message to describe the new approach.
> 
> v5-001 applies cleanly on PG19 and PG18, but not on PG17. Attached a
> separate PG17 patch.

Thanks for the patch. I locally tested with partitioned tables, and it worked
well. I have no comments.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) might keep dropped-column data
Next
From: Paul A Jungwirth
Date:
Subject: Re: [SP-]GiST IOS visibility bug (was: Why doens't GiST require super-exclusive lock)