need of anonymous record - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Krauss
Subject need of anonymous record
Date
Msg-id CAHEREtvjMBJu5m+mrGQMoy5xhkjamtPSS6k73aHOnq262duGmQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: need of anonymous record
Re: need of anonymous record
Re: need of anonymous record
List pgsql-hackers
My notion of "anonymous record", and the need of this kind of "higher-order type", are discussed in the links below,

  "Functions can not to return individual items of a record"

  "PostgreSQL v9.X have real 'array of record' ?

The first question is about performance: "returns table" have the same performance than "returns record"??
If "yes", the record datatype is somewhat outdated?


The second question/discussion shows a more deeper problem, where perhaps the use of string index in array syntax (something like x['a']) would be a good syntax solution.
Craig Ringer shows another suggestion in the (second) link.


I am new here, I do not know how, but I'm available to help... Can a future version of PostgreSQL implement some solution?


Peter

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_get_viewdefs() indentation considered harmful
Next
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?