voting to the xslt_process() need - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Padua Krauss
Subject voting to the xslt_process() need
Date
Msg-id CAHEREtuJNOg+VKsNwgO98wFxFENWaqSkLWfuQ_WiXiCciHOdVA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: voting to the xslt_process() need
List pgsql-hackers

I vote to see the contrib/xml2's xslt_process() build-in function (only xslt_process)
moved into PostgreSQL core.

----

Database servers can offer some "load balancing" with another CPUs, like a PHP server...
I have in mind some main examples:

* If database server not process XSLT, the balance is lost (for PHP processing DOM and XSLT).

* If database server not process XSLT, a lot of traffic and not-elegant code is necessary.

* If a "XML framework" is developed for "SQL-side", like Oracle-APEX, a lot of extra-workaround is necessary to build the framework (with external XML processing). 

* ...

Another big problem is the lack of xQuery, them the internal processing of XSLT is a important workaround.

Several "serious XML projects" are being lost to Oracle, only because of this lack of xQuey and XSLT support.

PS: the main XPath libraries implements also XSLT; PostgreSQL core have XPath, to add XSLT is only a little more.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: unaccent extension missing some accents
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Object access hooks with arguments support (v1)