On 2020-03-12 14:08:31 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > > I thought about that at first, but that'll only benefit people who're > hand-compiling things, and it's already possible with > > make with_llvm=no ...
Well, the difference is that you'd be told about it, instead of getting a hard to parse error message.
What about adding a WARNING but don't error out if LLVM isn't found? Add an additional option (if LLVM isn't found) is annoying because it means adding instruction into README of all extensions. What is the side effects of not providing .bc files? It seems some extensions won't benefit from LLVM.
