Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: _bt_delitems_delete() should use XLogRegisterBufData(), not XLogRegisterData() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: _bt_delitems_delete() should use XLogRegisterBufData(), not XLogRegisterData()
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wznr4tjtfbyoqT4xYQ6FOsnsbcjo7F4w4xbB7-OxJS+=-g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to _bt_delitems_delete() should use XLogRegisterBufData(), not XLogRegisterData()  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 1:00 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Attached patch shows what I have in mind. The new comment block has
> been copied from _bt_delitems_vacuum().

I also think that the WAL record and function signature of
_bt_delitems_delete() should be brought closer to
_bt_delitems_vacuum(). Attached patch does it that way.

I intend to commit this in the next day or two, barring any objections.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Recognizing superuser in pg_hba.conf
Next
From: cary huang
Date:
Subject: Re: Setting min/max TLS protocol in clientside libpq