Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wznk6Jd5z5-YiF0WOki0JyTumbLR__MsmJZM=HGWCJvWeA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 10:47 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> I may be missing something, but you cannot use directly a "postgres"
> command in a TAP test, can you?  See 1a9d802, that has fixed a problem
> when TAP tests run with a privileged account on Windows.

I was joking. But I did have a real point: once we have tests for the
xidStopLimit mechanism, why not take the opportunity to correct the
long standing issue with the documentation advising the use of single
user mode?

--
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher