Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)
Date
Msg-id ZAmA3V9J7nPVvNoo@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 09:21:00PM -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Surely your tap test should be using single user mode?  Perhaps you
> missed the obnoxious HINT, that's part of the WARNING that the test
> parses?  ;-)

I may be missing something, but you cannot use directly a "postgres"
command in a TAP test, can you?  See 1a9d802, that has fixed a problem
when TAP tests run with a privileged account on Windows.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum