Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)
Date
Msg-id CAAWbhmh70j7FH3v6FyJYCxYwD7Sqv6m74BF9M-knMavoF+XVog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 8:47 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> I was joking. But I did have a real point: once we have tests for the
> xidStopLimit mechanism, why not take the opportunity to correct the
> long standing issue with the documentation advising the use of single
> user mode?

Does https://commitfest.postgresql.org/42/4128/ address that
independently enough?

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: windows CI failing PMSignalState->PMChildFlags[slot] == PM_CHILD_ASSIGNED
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: meson: Non-feature feature options