On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> I still get a 2 fold improvement, from 13668 to 27036, when both
> transactions are tested with -M prepared.
>
> I am surprised, I usually haven't seen that much difference for the default
> queries between prepared or not, to the point that I got out of the habit of
> testing with it. But back when I was testing with and without
> systematically, I did notice that it changed a lot depending on hardware and
> concurrency. And of course from version to version different bottlenecks
> come and go.
I must admit that I had a similar unpleasant surprise at one point --
"-M prepared" seems to matter *a lot* these days. That's the default
that I'd change, if any.
--
Peter Geoghegan
