On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 7:25 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Probably a good idea, although it doesn't neatly fit right now.
I'll leave it for now.
Attached is v2, which changes things based on your feedback. Would
like to get this out of the way soon.
> > Also, does amcheck's get_xid_status() need a reference to these rules?
>
> Don't think so? Whad made you ask?
Just the fact that it seems to more or less follow the protocol
described at the top of heapam_visibility.c. Not very important,
though.
--
Peter Geoghegan
