Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzmsg4GWcNzUWqO6v8XmuHcznBR2q32wQLqnSzMKcP2onw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> I'd be interested in seeing the difference it makes if Postgres is
> built with the call to _bt_check_unique() commented out within
> nbtinsert.c.

Actually, I mean that I wonder how much of a difference it would make
if this entire block was commented out within _bt_doinsert():

if (checkUnique != UNIQUE_CHECK_NO)
{   ...
}


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Causal reads take II