Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Update comments in multixact.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Update comments in multixact.c
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzmM_G9O1QFbY_ixA5bwRqHhfXtav5BpbEb+H3Gfyxg=Nw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Update comments in multixact.c  ("shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
Responses RE: Update comments in multixact.c
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:33 AM shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com
<shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> I noticed that commit 5212d447fa updated some comments in multixact.c because
> SLRU truncation for multixacts is performed during VACUUM, instead of
> checkpoint. Should the following comments which mentioned checkpointer be
> changed, too?

Yes, I think so.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Decoupling antiwraparound autovacuum from special rules around auto cancellation