RE: Update comments in multixact.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: Update comments in multixact.c
Date
Msg-id OSZPR01MB6310A7CE00D48662CC829929FDC79@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update comments in multixact.c  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: Update comments in multixact.c
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 6:04 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:33 AM shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com
> <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > I noticed that commit 5212d447fa updated some comments in multixact.c
> because
> > SLRU truncation for multixacts is performed during VACUUM, instead of
> > checkpoint. Should the following comments which mentioned checkpointer be
> > changed, too?
> 
> Yes, I think so.

Thanks for your reply.

Attach a patch which fixed them.

Regards,
Shi yu

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Helper functions for wait_for_catchup() in Cluster.pm
Next
From: "Drouvot, Bertrand"
Date:
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys