Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: gist microvacuum doesn't appear to care about hot standby? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: gist microvacuum doesn't appear to care about hot standby?
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzmE1=ynHtcyRdHRqhgV29hYOkk+R_Y7sCbmuzMxzNFjSQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: gist microvacuum doesn't appear to care about hot standby?  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 4:41 PM Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> I thought about that, but decided it's better to mimic B-tree and hash
> behavior rather than invent new logic in a minor release.  But given
> that new WAL record in minor release in substantial problem, that
> argument doesn't matter.

It might be better to mimic B-Tree and hash on the master branch.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: don't create storage when unnecessary
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent?