On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:41 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 7:10 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> > All of the underlying errors are cases that were clearly intended to
> > catch user error -- every single one. But apparently pg_amcheck is
> > incapable of error, by definition. Like HAL 9000.
> But this comment seems like mockery to me, and I don't like that.
It was certainly not a constructive way of getting my point across.
I apologize to Mark.
--
Peter Geoghegan
