Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzkyt-kOOsb2XnQk6w_cZOYW8XCykAysAVg6iJDXqZ4A5Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:24 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I don't understand this patch.  Or maybe I should say I don't understand
> the code you're patching.  Why isn't the correct answer *always*
> nBlocksWritten?  The comment in LogicalTapeSet says:

I think that they are an exact match in practice (i.e. nBlocksWritten
== nBlocksAllocated), given when and how we call
LogicalTapeSetBlocks().

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore causing deadlocks on partitioned tables
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers