Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzkn0W2SFtdPk1pFZUPF9vZy82X6D85YTVt2qq3w7hRJug@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 9:17 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Will fix all those in the next revision. Thanks.

Attached revision v4 fixes those pg_dump patch items.

It also breaks out the ecpg changes into their own patch. Looks like
ecpg requires the same treatment as the timezone code and the regex
code -- it generally doesn't use named parameters in function
declarations, so the majority of its function declarations need to be
adjusted. The overall code churn impact is higher than it was with the
other two modules.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal to use JSON for Postgres Parser format
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: missing indexes in indexlist with partitioned tables