Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzkH2kk4yj6qq9BAAVb9tWPUMaEXq7TQkAsZ1BSD=Ei=fQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> I attach a patch to remove replacement selection, which I'll submit to CF 1.
>
> This breaks the documentation build, because
> doc/src/sgml/release-9.6.sgml still contains <xref
> linkend="guc-replacement-sort-tuples"> but you removed that id.

Thanks for looking into it.

I suppose that the solution is to change the 9.6 release notes to no
longer have a replacement_sort_tuples link. Anyone else have an
opinion on that?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Minor code improvement to postgresGetForeignPlan
Next
From: Omar Kilani
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster