Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=v_YVfgMvZ-BpxxmtzW=D1fFT4YAHcM3m=jeQcSwyBxw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 9:16 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> And now here's v8, which has the following additional cleanup:

And here's v9, which has improved commit messages for the first 2
patches, and many small tweaks within all 4 patches.

The most interesting change is that lazy_scan_heap() now has a fairly
elaborate assertion that verifies that its idea about whether or not
the page is all_visible and all_frozen is shared by
heap_page_is_all_visible() -- this is a stripped down version of the
logic that now lives in lazy_scan_heap(). It exists so that the second
pass over the heap can set visibility map bits.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: What to call an executor node which lazily caches tuples in a hash table?