On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 5:01 AM Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the bloom filter index forgets to increment the index
> scan counter
> while reviewing the skip scan patch [1]. It seems this was simply
> overlooked in
> the implementation. What do you think?
I think that you're right.
I'll commit this and backpatch once the release tags for the pending
set of point releases are pushed.
--
Peter Geoghegan