On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> As long as btree only has one no-data tuple per page, I think we are good,
> because this calculation does not account for page special space. We might
> be underestimating how many tuples can fit by one MAXALIGN quantum, but
> the special space takes up at least one MAXALIGN quantum, so it's safe.
>
> Twouldn't be a bad idea to document this reasoning, though.
Thanks for taking care of this.
> Also, my first reaction on looking at this code was "who added
> MinIndexTupleSize and then didn't replace the equivalent subexpression
> of MaxIndexTuplesPerPage with MinIndexTupleSize?".
I had the same reaction.
--
Peter Geoghegan
