On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:23 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> This has to be the oldest_xact field. If it was any of the other
> fields, the "%d" format would not result in an error (it would just
> result in incorrectly displaying a negative integer). oldest_xact is
> the only field that uses "%u" (unfortunately, the declaration makes
> the field an int4/integer, so you may see this error).
Pushed a fix for this just now.
Thanks for the report!
--
Peter Geoghegan
