On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:18 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Right, I mean I'm not saying I *like* reverting, and I'm not disputing
> it's a good feature. Just that, if we have to choose between this
> feature and not having index corruption, we better not have index
> corruption.... and I'm not seeing any way that we can just tweak this
> and make it work.
Are we any closer to deciding on a timeline, in light of recent discussion?
I'm now convinced that an out-of-schedule release is probably the way
to go. My thinking is: are we really going to make users wait for
August 11th for a fix?
--
Peter Geoghegan
