On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> Why not fixing that? Reproducible builds are a trend of these days,
>> and what's proposed here is really simple to make PG more compliant
>> with this purpose in mind.
>
> It's not like $0 instead of a hardcoded name in the header actually buys
> us anything afaict.
+1.
I think that reproducible builds are a worthwhile goal, and I welcome
Christoph's continued work on them.
--
Peter Geoghegan
