Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47language tags. Should it? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47language tags. Should it?
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=REBtBRLDXeFYuZW=84Or5H2jmRBwd_ve1Wijy308HfA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47language tags. Should it?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47language tags. Should it?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Reading over this code again, it is admittedly not quite clear why this
> "canonicalization" is in there right now.  I think it had something to
> do with how we built the keyword variants at one point.  It might not
> make sense.  I'd be glad to take that out and use the result straight
> from uloc_getAvailable() for collcollate.  That is, after all, the
> "canonical" version that ICU chooses to report to us.

Is anything going to happen here ahead of shipping v10? This remains
an open item.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId?