Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=3LbiK+XaDja8p5nohuyjBVMR-t4UhSFEsx4fMKA94RQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> And, indeed, you could get an unique constraint or exclusion error
> because of an index on the child even though it's not global to the
> partitioning hierarchy.  So maybe we can support this after all, but
> having messed it up once, I'm inclined to think we should postpone
> this to v11, think it over some more, a

Fine by me.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in _hash_kill_items/MarkBufferDirtyHint
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines