Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: wal_segment size vs max_wal_size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kuntal Ghosh
Subject Re: wal_segment size vs max_wal_size
Date
Msg-id CAGz5QCK9WNW5BD1Gpo2Az=Bf=cQcY+FmHF1kx1mMUXjrkABe5Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: wal_segment size vs max_wal_size  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: wal_segment size vs max_wal_size  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> IIRC, there is already a patch to update the minRecoveryPoint
> correctly, can you check if that solves the problem for you?
>
> [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160609.215558.118976703.horiguchi.kyotaro%40lab.ntt.co.jp
>
+1. I've tested after applying the patch. This clearly solves the problem.

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Aggregate Push Down - Performing aggregation on foreign server