Re: Logging successful SELECTS? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Виктор Егоров
Subject Re: Logging successful SELECTS?
Date
Msg-id CAGnEbogMzfkpdCDRJXr1nT1OdM8z9FgDjSTa_qTC1x-yoSsfDA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Logging successful SELECTS?  (Matthew Vernon <matthew.vernon@sac.ac.uk>)
List pgsql-general
2013/1/24 Matthew Vernon <matthew.vernon@sac.ac.uk>:
> I can get postgres to log unsuccessful queries, including the user who
> wrote them, but I'm missing how to get postgres to log the successful
> queries too (I don't need a store of the answer, just the query
> itself). How do I do this?

You can use either log_min_duration_statement or log_statement.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/runtime-config-logging.html

I would recommend using the first one, logging all statements that took longer
then, say, 300ms. Otherwise logs might become too huge to manage.

--
Victor Y. Yegorov


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Moshe Jacobson
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizing select count query which often takes over 10 seconds
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Logging successful SELECTS?