Re: Retiring some encodings? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From wenhui qiu
Subject Re: Retiring some encodings?
Date
Msg-id CAGjGUA+LNRTo34tqmnmhgJQ4k=tL8dY2DV80dj-ozh+rhXkE4Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Retiring some encodings?  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: Retiring some encodings?
List pgsql-hackers
HI 
> The obvious question is how many people would suffer because
> of that removal, as it would prevent them from using pg_upgrade.

> Can anybody who works in a region that uses these encodings make
> an educated guess?
+1 Agree ,GB18030 A coding standard in China, if deleted, will have an impact on the application of postgresql in China, and China is now experiencing more and more hot postgresql heat, need to consider carefully!

On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 4:22 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> On 23 May 2025, at 09:18, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:

> If we plan to remove something in the future, I think putting a deprecation notice in the docs in v18 is still a good idea. There's no point in hiding the plan by not documenting it sooner. The more advance notice people get the better.

+1

--
Daniel Gustafsson



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Enable data checksums by default