PG_VERSION_NUM formatted incorrectly - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Kieran McCusker
Subject PG_VERSION_NUM formatted incorrectly
Date
Msg-id CAGgUQ6Fd0EjQZLnp-JsBSCashtehx6rLbq_crx6y=++JZqm0Rw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: PG_VERSION_NUM formatted incorrectly
Re: PG_VERSION_NUM formatted incorrectly
List pgsql-bugs
Hi

I was looking at an issue with ogr_fdw where it is trying to get the PG_VERSION_NUM when I noticed that in Postgresql 10.1 this is declared as:

#define PG_VERSION_NUM 100001

But shouldn't it be

#define PG_VERSION_NUM 100100

or am I being dense, in which case sorry to have bothered you.

Many Thanks

Kieran McCusker

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "JOSEPH Michel (EXT AMARIS)"
Date:
Subject: Problem running post-install step.
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: PG_VERSION_NUM formatted incorrectly