Re: Is it worth pushing conditions to sublink/subplan? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From li jie
Subject Re: Is it worth pushing conditions to sublink/subplan?
Date
Msg-id CAGfChW6HiMSqzMS6wpdCN1W104MBMtCM8ENkv7yMwsyZ8b=bfw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Is it worth pushing conditions to sublink/subplan?  (Wenjing <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Indeed, this may be useful for partition pruning.
I am also curious about why this has not been achieved.

Wenjing <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com> 于2021年8月23日周一 上午10:46写道:
Hi Hackers,

Recently, a issue has been bothering me, This is about conditional push-down in SQL.
I use cases from regression testing as an example.
I found that the conditions  (B =1)  can be pushed down into the subquery, However, it cannot be pushed down to sublink/subplan.
If a sublink/subplan clause contains a partition table, it can be useful to get the conditions for pruning.
So, is it worth pushing conditions to sublink/subplan?
Anybody have any ideas?


regards,
Wenjing


example:
create table p (a int, b int, c int) partition by list (a);
create table p1 partition of p for values in (1);
create table p2 partition of p for values in (2);
create table q (a int, b int, c int) partition by list (a);
create table q1 partition of q for values in (1) partition by list (b);
create table q11 partition of q1 for values in (1) partition by list (c);
create table q111 partition of q11 for values in (1);
create table q2 partition of q for values in (2) partition by list (b);
create table q21 partition of q2 for values in (1);
create table q22 partition of q2 for values in (2);
insert into q22 values (2, 2, 3);


postgres-# explain (costs off)
postgres-# select temp.b  from 
postgres-# (
postgres(# select a,b from ab x where x.a = 1
postgres(# union all 
postgres(# (values(1,1)) 
postgres(# ) temp,
postgres-# ab y
postgres-# where  y.b = temp.b and y.a = 1 and y.b=1;
                    QUERY PLAN                     
---------------------------------------------------
 Nested Loop
   ->  Seq Scan on ab_a1_b1 y
         Filter: ((b = 1) AND (a = 1))
   ->  Append
         ->  Subquery Scan on "*SELECT* 1"
               ->  Seq Scan on ab_a1_b1 x
                     Filter: ((a = 1) AND (b = 1))
         ->  Result
(8 rows)

The conditions  (B =1)  can be pushed down into the subquery.

postgres=# explain (costs off)
postgres-# select
postgres-# y.a,
postgres-# (Select x.b from ab x where y.a =x.a and y.b=x.b) as b
postgres-# from ab y where a = 1 and b = 1;
                    QUERY PLAN                     
---------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on ab_a1_b1 y
   Filter: ((a = 1) AND (b = 1))
   SubPlan 1
     ->  Append
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a1_b1 x_1
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a1_b2 x_2
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a1_b3 x_3
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a2_b1 x_4
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a2_b2 x_5
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a2_b3 x_6
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a3_b1 x_7
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a3_b2 x_8
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a3_b3 x_9
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
(22 rows)

The conditions (B = 1 and A = 1) cannot be pushed down to sublink/subplan in targetlist.

postgres=# explain (costs off)
postgres-# select y.a
postgres-# from ab y 
postgres-# where
postgres-# (select x.a > x.b from ab x where y.a =x.a and y.b=x.b) and
postgres-# y.a = 1 and y.b = 1;
                    QUERY PLAN                     
---------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on ab_a1_b1 y
   Filter: ((a = 1) AND (b = 1) AND (SubPlan 1))
   SubPlan 1
     ->  Append
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a1_b1 x_1
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a1_b2 x_2
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a1_b3 x_3
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a2_b1 x_4
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a2_b2 x_5
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a2_b3 x_6
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a3_b1 x_7
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a3_b2 x_8
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
           ->  Seq Scan on ab_a3_b3 x_9
                 Filter: ((y.a = a) AND (y.b = b))
(22 rows)

The conditions  (B=1 and A=1)  cannot be pushed down to sublink/subplan in where clause.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Improved regular expression error message for backrefs
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side